Some consumer groups are
cheering the decision, saying it will mean lower rates for good drivers. However,
groups like the Regional Council on Rural Counties and insurance industry
representatives contends the regulations will result in higher rates for
suburban and rural residents while giving decreases only to a few large urban
areas like Orange County and San Francisco County. Insurers are still debating
whether to appeal. Currently there are around 20 factors that contribute to the auto
insurance rates that make up the premiums that you and I pay, however the
current controversy is swirling around just one of those factors- your zip
code. In the event that the
rates were equalized for all zip codes Amador County will see rate increases of
around 13.7 to 15 percent per policy.
Calaveras County would see rate increases ranging from 7 to 16 percent, according to opponents of the plan. Critics of the plan have base their argument on studies released by the Department of Insurance - the latest report from Mercer Oliver Wyman Oliver report came out last week - which show 52 of the 58 counties in California will see rate increases. Other likely outcomes according to the report would be: Massive rate increases of 24.1% in Modoc County; 32.2% in Mono County; 36.5% in Imperial County; and 29.0% in Siskiyou County (to name a few) to provide decreases of 1.3% in Orange County; 12.7% in Los Angeles County; and 11.8% in San Francisco County.
According to Bob Downer, former chief actuary
for Farmers Insurance and an independent actuary “I’m just quoting the numbers
from the state authorized study … and only four, big urban counties see their
rates go down,” he told the Calaveras Enterprise. That’s because there’s a
correlation between where you live and what risks you face, said Tully Lehman,
a Pleasant Hill-based spokesman for the Insurance Information Network of
California, a nonprofit consumer group. Congested, urban areas like Los Angeles
have high vandalism, theft and accident rates, creating a greater number of
auto insurance claims filed. Lehman said ignoring ZIP codes doesn’t reduce the
risk high claim areas have, or costs to insurance companies.
They would just
offset losses by increasing premiums in low risk areas, he said. Still, attention to where a driver
and their car reside is out of proportion with a 1988, voter-mandated
proposition, according to Former Commissioner Garamendi. Part of
Proposition 103 dictates that three mandatory factors - driving record, miles
driven, and years of driving experience - be given the greatest weight in
determining auto rates. During the decade after the initiative was adopted,
auto insurance premiums dropped 22 percent statewide, while the rest of the
nation’s premiums rose 30 percent, according to reports from the Foundation for
Taxpayer and Consumer rights, a consumer watchdog group. The zip code
controversy is one area of Prop 103 that has been loosely enforced, and by the
late 1990s, the cities of Los Angeles, Oakland and San Francisco, along with
consumer groups, engaged in legal battles with former insurance commissioner
Chuck Quackenbush. Former Commissioner Garamendi was then approached by these
groups after they saw little progress in the fight over the zip code rules.
Garamendi made his position clear on this issue, saying in a recent interview
that ZIP codes have nothing to do with how well a community drives.“It has
everything to do with delivering the mail,” he said.