News Archive (6192)
The Jackson City Council and Planning Commission
held a joint meeting Monday night to review the recent changes to the Jackson Draft Land Use
Element. Changes to the document were
made from a compilation of recommendations from local organizations and public
comments from prior city council meetings. One important section of the element
that was significantly updated concerned growth within the city. The document now states that “growth in the City of Jackson shall
occur only if new development adequately mitigates its environmental impacts,
addresses housing availability and affordability needs, and respects open space
resources…” This new update to the land
use element is a considerable improvement over the previous statement, which
simply referred to growth in Jackson
that “is not detrimental to its neighborhoods.”
Concerned Citizens of Jackson, a local government watchdog group, has
been involved with the update process and seemed pleased with the updates made
to the element.
The usability of local parks was also updated in
the element. The proposed land use element requires that developers “shall
provide park areas within reasonable walking distance to all residences.” Terri
Works posed the question of whether these “pocket parks” were really useful as
compared to a larger, regional
park that could be used by the community. Works referred to the neighborhood
park in the Woodside development behind Raley’s, saying they “don’t seem really
useful.” Jointly, the council and the commission decided to modify that
rule to include only those developments with eight or more units and extend the
walking time to 10 minutes.
Board’s Deadlock Means They Will Not Participate In Arbitration
Written by
A special joint meeting between the Board of
Supervisors and the Amador
Water Agency, or AWA, was held yesterday at the County Offices. The meeting was
open to the public. The two parties discussed- but did not take any
action -on a number of water and wastewater matters currently affecting the
county. Supervisor Richard Forster was present and played “host” throughout the
proceedings. Matters
pertaining to water issues included discussion of new developments, the status
of the water supply for Carbondale Industrial Park, the water supply
pipeline to the City of Plymouth, and the proposed Wild and Scenic River
designation for the Mokelumne River.
Debbie Dunn was on hand to represent the Foothill Conservancy, which
has been pushing for the Mokelumne’s Wild and Scenic designation. Pros
and Cons for Wild and Scenic status were
discussed, including the relative ease or difficulty such a designation would
make for the Water Agency in implementing future regulations upon that portion
of the river. In reference to wastewater
issues, AWA general manager Jim Abercrombie talked about the capacity of the
Sutter Creek Plant. There was also some talk about the Camanche area and taking
drinking water over the hill to a landowner’s property. This decision could be
affected by the presence of the California Tiger Salamander, which
has been discovered within a mile of the area.
The Environmental Protection Agency is interested in how the Salamander’s habitat will be affected. A final discussion occurred between Dunn and Abercrombie concerning the wastewater capacity at the Airport. Dunn, a representative of the Airport Committee and its ongoing renovations and improvements to the airport, seemed surprised when Abercrombie remarked that the AWA has no to little further wastewater capacity available for the airport to use. Discussions will continue at future meetings.
Jackson Discusses The Cost To Citizens To Treat Waste Water In The Future
Written by
Proposed amendments to a bill that could loosen
restrictions on Indian
uses of public land are being opposed by the Board of Supervisors. The proposed
amendments could provide Native American tribes or tribal groups with the
authority to seek immediate cancellation of the Williamson Act contract by
qualifying a myriad of new uses on public land in public interest. In other
words, it would loosen the regulations on activities that could be viewed as
publicly beneficial on lands in which Tribes have an interest. “This indicates one more time that
some powerful sovereign people realize that by using our legislation they can
gain more power,” said activist Debbie Dunn during public comment at
yesterday’s Board of Supervisors meeting. Supervisor Louis Boitano focused on
the long term perspective when referring to what could be more lax regulations
against tribal development. “Smaller,
financially strapped counties wouldn’t have the resources to go into the cost
of litigation- like us,” he said. In addition, members of the California
State Association of Counties wrote a letter to State Assemblyman Tony Mendoza,
who introduced the amendments.
The letter states: “These proposed amendments
are in conflict with this policy and make a mockery of the County’s most
successful voluntary farmland conservatory program.” The California Land
Conservation Act of 1965--commonly referred to as the Williamson Act--enables
local governments to enter into contracts with private landowners for the purpose of restricting specific parcels of
land to agricultural or related open space use. In return, landowners receive
property tax assessments which are much lower than normal because they are
based upon farming and open space uses as opposed to full market value. The
Board unanimously voted against the amendments.
After the Amador County Board of Supervisors
deadlocked over approval of the Intergovernmental Services Agreement, or ISA, drafted by Tribal and County
staff over months of negotiations, the Buena Vista Tribe yesterday announced it
will file a demand for binding arbitration, as provided for under its
Tribal-State Gaming Compact signed with Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. Under
rules set up in the Compact and by both parties, the County and the Tribe had until March 18, 2008,
at midnight to submit to each other their respective last, best written offers
for purposes of arbitration.
Yesterday, the Tribe submitted its last,
best written offer to the County. However, the County advised the Tribe
yesterday that it will not be submitting an offer to the Tribe. Furthermore,
the County stated it will not be participating in the arbitration proceedings. "As the County has
acknowledged, the earlier-negotiated ISA offered the County terms and
mitigation measures that went well beyond those required by the Compact,"
said John Tang, CEO of the Buena Vista Rancheria. "Our last, best written
offer made to the County yesterday, and the only one that will be before
the arbitrator, is nearly identical to the one previously negotiated. We could
have made substantial and justifiable changes to the ISA that would have been
much more favorable to the Tribe, but chose not to. Half the Supervisors who
voted supported the negotiated ISA. We want to build on that.” An arbitrator
will be selected in the coming weeks and it is expected that the arbitrator
will issue an award by the end of April.

