|
Sutter Creek Planning Commission: Annexation Still Being Discussed |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, 10 January 2007 |
Earlier this week the Sutter Creek Planning Commission
held a public hearing on
the Sutter Hill East Reorganization; which would annex 56.3 acres of Sutter
Hill property to the city of Sutter Creek from Amador County’s
jurisdiction. The annexation had inadvertently been sent to the city
council last week lacking complete environmental documents and was then redirected
to the planning commission for their recommendation to the council. The
annexation includes the Amador Transit Mix concrete company and 3 other major
sources of tax revenue opportunities for the city. The annexation has caused a
bit of controversy with some of the surrounding land owners involved because
portions of the annexation were possibly going to be rezoned from Residential
to Planned development.
Land owners told the commission that they felt the rezoning
depreciated the value of their property and that it would be a deal breaker for
them because some of the property owners cooperating are not gaining anything
by the annexation but are only trying to do something good for the city.
The commission responded by saying that they must be cautious in the way they
zone this project. They told the land owners if the property is zoned
residential, that leaves the door open for a developer to come in, by the property,
and build a major monstrosity.
New City Planner Paula Daneluk then informed the council that
they had the option of zoning the property residential and then developing a
set of standards for any proposed development. Planning Commissioner
Robin Peters stated, "We
have to be smart about this. Every property changes hands at some time. Good
planning is our business, if they feel politics outweigh good planning, then
that is part of the very tough decision they have to make. But I don't think we
should recommend any project, this one included, if it is bad planning."
The commission did not make a recommendation and tabled the annexation to allow
for staff to meet with the land owners and iron out details. It is expected to
come back to the commission for their recommendation next month.
|
|
Last Updated ( Monday, 29 January 2007 )
|