|
Amador County’s budget has seen better days, or
more specifically better years. CAO Terri Daly told the BOS on Tuesday that there is never an easy year
for a budget and she said that is the way she thinks it should be, because a
challenging budget ensures staff is being efficient for the year. “This year is
especially challenging year because of reduced revenues from many sources,”
said Daly. Since this is the first year that two Supervisors, Oneto and
Novelli, are new to the board, Daly explained the budget process. She said the
budget starts in January every year and the board issues budget instructions
that include strategies for the upcoming fiscal year. She said this year those
instructions were no new
programs and personnel, and that the budget maintain a 3% contingency for the
general fund, which she later explained is for emergency situations.
Based upon those instructions the auditor
prepares a base budget for all the departments, and using that information each
of the department heads develop their budget using budget strategies and then
submit them to the CAO and auditor for budget hearings. During these hearings,
Daly explained, the department heads make their case for increasing their
budget. “The Auditor and
CAO use their red pens to cut expenditures,” although Daly explained that was
not enough this year as the budget after the final process had a 6 million
dollar shortfall. “I
went to work to find 6 million dollars and went through several rounds of
budget cuts. I had to trim the fat but not the muscle.”
The budget
appeared before the Administrative Committee last week without the 6 million
dollar shortfall. Daly then highlighted the budget. “In general we have two major elements of the
budget. We have the General Fund which is primarily made up of property taxes
and sales tax. And the other funds we
have are more specific fund revenues that come in and have to be spent in a
specific area,” she said. Daly reported that the way Amador County
manages their budget differs from other counties. For instance she explained
that larger county’s have budget analyst while Amador County depends on the CAO
and Auditor. Daly said that while looking at revenues the County is very
conservative and when looking at expenditures they always use a higher
percentage to be safe.
She then discussed the numbers associated with this
year’s budget.:
The Budget
total for all funds is about $68 million dollars. The General Fund is estimated
at about $36.2 million which is a .8% increase as last year they estimated
$35.9 million.
Property taxes she stated are going to level off this
year because of the change in the economy. She also reported another hit to the budget was the
reallocation of the sales tax revenue from the Martell area. Daly explained the
money was solely allocated to the cities and that at some point the monies will
be refunded to the county, but she said they are not sure of how much or when.
The Budgets total recommended
expenditures are $72.9 million a decrease from last years budgeted $73.7
million.
General Fund expenditures are expected to be $42.4 million, a $1.9
million increase. Daly said the increase is primarily due to a $1.67
million swell in General Fund contribution to the Capital Improvement projects
the county has undertaken.
She explained the costs will significantly decrease
next year.
She went on to say there are other noteworthy cost in the General Fund budget such as
$360,000 in expenses for the General Plan Update and $500,000 in expenses for
outside County Counsel utilized to fight illegitimate Indian gaming endeavors.
Daly said this year the County has frozen a number of positions as well as have
been very frugal in allocating any additional fixed assets such as computers,
which she described as “a little scary.” She said that the County will only be
able to operate in this manner for a couple years because clearly positions
need to be filled and computers updated and replaced. She reported that those
weren’t the only cuts made. This
year the County eliminated local travel, meetings and conventions, and staff
training (with the exception of those that require training every year).
Also
eliminated was $20,000 formerly allocated to the grant writer. Also the
Supervisors discretionary fund was cut from $10,000 to $5,000. Which
Supervisor Forster pointed out was at the request of the Supervisors
themselves. “We felt that if the departments take a hit than we
should take one also.” Overall this year’s budget is looking tighter
than the County has seen in almost 10 years. The Board of Supervisors on
Tuesday thanked Terri for her hard work and Novelli even joked, “Terri when you call Pat
(Blacklock), call him collect.” The final budget will appear before the
board sometime in August.
|