|
Jackson Planning Commission Makes Recommendation On Jackson Hills Golf Community Project After 5 Hou |
|
|
|
|
Tuesday, 08 May 2007 |
Last night the Jackson
Planning Commission held a
special meeting to make their recommendations to the City Council concerning
the Jackson Hills Residential Community. The projects developer, New Faze Development is proposing
540 homes, an eighteen hole golf course, clubhouse, restaurant and maintenance facilities,
recreation community center and spa, a 3 acre park and all the necessary
roadway and infrastructure improvements associated with, and supporting, site
development. Jackson and other County residents have mixed feelings
about the project. Some state that there are major impacts that outweigh the
benefits of the project. Impacts such as: traffic, sewer, effects on neighboring range land, and impacts
local Police and Fire services.
Also a major concern is the
density of the project which has lot sizes ranging in size from 6,000 square
feet to one acre. It has been argued in the past that the new General Plan
proposed minimum lot sizes of 8,000 square feet and larger and that the Jackson
Hills developer should be held to that lot size. A benefit of the project, it has been argued is using
reclaimed water to water the golf course.This has been a major argument
on behalf of the opponents, but according to City Planner Susan Peters if recycled water is not available
the project would designate the associated golf course lots as Open Space under
the General Plan Amendment and place development prohibitions within the
Planned Unit Master Development Plan.
Last night after nearly 5 hours of
public comment and discussion the Jackson Planning Commission, after hearing
arguments both for and against the project recommended, denial of the project
to the City Council. Commissioners
Terri Works, Dave Butow and Warren Carlton all said no to the project with
Commissioners Wayne Garibaldi and Leticia Sexton stating that they would like
to see a redesign of the project. Ultimately it’s the City Council who
has the final vote in the matter. The Planning Commission’s recommendation will
now move forward to the City Council for their review and discussion
|
|
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 22 May 2007 )
|